The pan-Yoruba socio-political group Afenifere has expressed disapproval of President Bola Tinubu’s appointments, which they perceive as disproportionately favoring the Yoruba ethnic group. In a statement issued by leader Ayo Adebanjo and Justice Faleye in Ibadan, the group cautioned that this trend could jeopardize inter-ethnic relationships and the peaceful co-existence of Nigeria’s diverse ethnic groups.

Afenifere’s criticism focuses on the concentration of power among Yoruba individuals in key federal government positions, including leadership roles in the criminal justice system, economic agencies, and security forces. They argue that such “Yorubalisation” mirrors the ethnic favoritism criticized during former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, which was accused of promoting northern hegemony. The group warns that endorsing a single ethnic dominance, whether Yoruba or otherwise, undermines Nigeria’s pluralistic values and historical commitment to inclusivity.

The implications of these appointments are profound for national integration and unity. A government perceived as favoring one ethnic group over others can exacerbate existing tensions among Nigeria’s diverse ethnicities, potentially leading to feelings of alienation and disenfranchisement in marginalized groups. This not only threatens the social fabric of the nation but also risks destabilizing the political landscape by fostering resentment and division.

Furthermore, Afenifere’s statement resonates with historical concerns regarding the dangers of ethnic hegemony. The group’s commitment to democratic principles and equitable representation underscores the necessity for the Tinubu administration to embrace a more balanced approach to governance. Failing to address these disparities could result in further social fragmentation, as groups like Afenifere stand firm against any form of ethnic favoritism.

While the presidency has countered allegations of bias by presenting data on the regional distribution of appointments, Afenifere remains skeptical. The perceived imbalance in key roles may not only challenge Tinubu’s legitimacy but could also hinder efforts to unify a country already fraught with ethnic and regional divisions.

In summary, the current situation necessitates urgent attention to ensure that Nigeria’s governance reflects its rich diversity. Addressing the concerns raised by Afenifere and promoting a genuinely inclusive political environment are essential steps toward fostering national unity and preventing the pitfalls of ethnic rivalry.