The state of Nigeria's teaching hospitals is a dire reflection of the broader challenges plaguing the nation's healthcare system. Established to serve as centers of medical excellence, these institutions are now themselves in critical condition, grappling with issues that threaten not only the lives of patients but also the economic stability of the nation.

The problems are multifaceted. Hospitals like the University College Hospital in Ibadan and the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital face severe shortages in medical equipment and staff. The absence of functioning MRI machines, outdated mammography equipment, and unreliable power supply are not just inconveniences—they are life-threatening deficiencies. This situation is further compounded by the exodus of qualified healthcare professionals, who leave in search of better opportunities abroad. This brain drain exacerbates the already critical shortage of doctors and nurses, leaving the remaining staff overwhelmed and overworked, leading to increased medical errors and compromised patient care.

The economic implications of this healthcare crisis are profound. With teaching hospitals unable to provide adequate care, those who can afford it seek medical treatment abroad, draining the country's scarce foreign exchange reserves. This "medical tourism" not only depletes national resources but also underscores the widening inequality in access to healthcare within the country. Those left behind—unable to afford treatment abroad—suffer in a system that is failing them.

The solution to this crisis requires a multifaceted approach. First, there must be a substantial increase in funding for the healthcare sector. This funding should prioritize the procurement and maintenance of modern medical equipment, ensuring that hospitals are equipped to handle the diagnostic and therapeutic needs of patients.

Second, addressing the power supply issues is crucial. Hospitals cannot function without reliable electricity, and the current reliance on expensive generators is unsustainable. Investing in alternative energy sources, such as solar power, could provide a more stable and cost-effective solution.

Furthermore, the government must take immediate steps to stem the brain drain. This could be achieved by improving the working conditions and remuneration of healthcare professionals, ensuring that they are adequately compensated and have access to the necessary tools to do their jobs effectively. Additionally, the recruitment of new staff should be expedited, particularly in institutions like the Osun State University Teaching Hospital, where no significant hiring has occurred in over a decade.

Finally, there needs to be a reevaluation of the management and operational structures of these teaching hospitals. Clearer lines of accountability must be established to ensure that funds allocated for healthcare are used efficiently and transparently. The involvement of private partnerships, as seen in some hospitals, should be explored further, but with stringent oversight to prevent exploitation and ensure that patient care remains the primary focus.

In conclusion, the current state of Nigeria’s teaching hospitals is a national emergency that requires immediate and sustained action. Without intervention, the cycle of decline will continue, with devastating consequences for the health and well-being of the nation. It is time for the government, healthcare professionals, and the private sector to come together to revive these critical institutions, ensuring that they fulfill their intended role as centers of medical excellence and not symbols of a failing system.

The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has announced the appointment of German tactician Bruno Labbadia as the new Head Coach for the Super Eagles.

Labbadia’s appointment is coming after 73 days since the NFF has maintained a deafening silence on who will take over the rein of leadership in the county’s national football team.

With an official statement issued Tuesday morning, the German is set to be the Men’s senior football team’s 37th coach since the creation of the team in 1949.

This decision was said to be endorsed by the NFF Executive Committee after the recommendation from the Technical and Development Sub-Committee of the federation.

“The NFF Executive Committee has approved the recommendation of its Technical and Development Sub-Committee to appoint Bruno Labbadia as the Head Coach of the Super Eagles. The appointment is with immediate effect”, Mohammed Sanusi, NFF General Secretary, affirmed.

However, despite the hush agreement, the NFF has failed to indicate the duration or any other contract details for coach Labbada.

Born 8 February 1966 in Darmstadt, Germany, Labbadia had a distinguished playing career, winning two caps for the German national team and claiming the German Bundesliga title with Bayern Munich in 1994.

He has also coached several prominent teams, including Hertha Berlin, VfB Stuttgart, VfL Wolfsburg, and Bayer Leverkusen, and holds a UEFA Pro Licence.

Labbadia becomes the sixth German to lead the Super Eagles, following in the footsteps of Karl-Heinz Marotzke, Gottlieb Göller, Manfred Höner, Berti Vogts, and Gernot Rohr.

Notably, Höner guided the team to a runner-up finish at the 1988 Africa Cup of Nations, while Rohr led Nigeria to the 2018 FIFA World Cup finals in Russia.

Herculean task

Labbadia’s first task will be to prepare the team for two crucial 2025 Africa Cup of Nations qualifying matches against Benin Republic on 7 September in Uyo and Rwanda on 10 September in Kigali.

With the Super Eagles also in an unpleasant position in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers, Labbadia will be expected to turn around the national team’s fortunes

Four additional matches will follow in October and November to conclude the qualifying campaign.

PT

Israeli military says hostage rescued from Gaza tunnel in 'complex operation'

Israeli special forces have recovered an Israeli hostage from a tunnel in southern Gaza in "a complex rescue operation", the military said on Tuesday, more than 10 months after he was abducted by Hamas-led gunmen.

It said 52-year-old Qaid Farhan Alkadi, a member of the Bedouin community in southern Israel who worked as a security guard on a kibbutz near the Gaza border, had been transferred to hospital and his condition was stable.

Military spokesperson Daniel Hagari said Alkadi had been rescued in an underground tunnel but gave no details of the operation, citing the security of the remaining hostages in the Gaza Strip and Israeli forces.

A military official told Reuters that soldiers were operating in the area where Alkadi was found, navigating a complex underground system where hostages were suspected to be held alongside militants and explosives.

"Farhan was found by the troops when he was alone, and was rescued from the tunnel," the official said. "As part of the preparations for the operation, lessons were learned from previous events and encounters with hostages."

Israeli media quoted Alkadi as saying he had not seen the sun for almost eight months, and that another hostage who was with him for two months had "died next to me".

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said he had spoken with Alkadi, commended the troops for the rescue and said Israel would work "tirelessly" for the return of all the hostages.

"We do this in two main ways: through negotiations and rescue operations. Both ways together require our military presence in the field, and unceasing military pressure on Hamas," he said.

During the phone conversation, Netanyahu told Alkadi he was "so happy to speak with you". Alkadi replied: "I thank you for this work, that you have reached a situation in which I see my family and am here. You truly did sacred work. There are other people who are waiting."

The operation was hailed by Israeli leaders, desperate for good news almost a year into a grinding military campaign against Hamas during which pressure has mounted on the government to do more to bring over 100 hostages back home.

'MIRACULOUS'

President Isaac Herzog said the rescue was "a moment of joy for the State of Israel and Israeli society as a whole".

Israel's Hostage Families Forum called Alkadi's return "nothing short of miraculous" but that military operations alone will not free the remaining hostages "who have suffered 326 days of abuse and terror.

"A negotiated deal is the only way forward," the group said in a statement. "We urgently call on the international community to maintain pressure on Hamas to accept the proposed deal and release all hostages. The remaining hostages cannot afford to wait for another such miracle."

As the rescue was confirmed, Israeli television stations showed a military helicopter landing at a hospital as medical staff and ambulance stood by waiting to receive Alkadi.

"He is in good condition. He is now going through tests," his brother Hathem Alkadi told Channel 12 TV, saying Qaid had lost a lot of weight in captivity.

"We are happy we saw him and saw him alive, first and foremost. He asked about his family, if his kids were OK and his mother was OK."

Alkadi was taken hostage in Kibbutz Magen, one of a string of Israeli communities around the Gaza Strip stormed by Hamas-led fighters in a cross-border incursion on Oct. 7.

More than 250 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in the attack, in which some 1,200 people were killed.

Alkadi's rescue leaves 108 Israeli and foreign hostages still in Gaza but around a third of these are known to have died, with the fate of the others unknown.

The operation followed the rescue of four Israeli hostages in June.

There has been little progress reported from talks to agree a halt to the war in Gaza and the return of the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

Reuters

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Russian attacks on Ukraine kill six in second day of major strikes, Kyiv says

Russia launched missile and drone attacks targeting scores of Ukrainian regions and killing at least six people, officials said on Tuesday, a day after Moscow's biggest air attack of the war on its neighbour.

Three people were killed when a hotel was "wiped out" by a missile in the central city of Kryvyi Rih, regional officials said. Five people were injured and one person was still missing after the strike, Serhiy Lysak, governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region that includes Kryvyi Rih, said on Telegram.

Separately, three people were killed in drone attacks on the southeastern Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia.

Three people were also injured in the Zaporizhzhia region and four were hurt in a missile strike on the northeastern region of Kharkiv overnight, local authorities said.

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday that Ukraine would retaliate against Russia for its attacks. He asked allies to consider joint air defence operations and provide long-range capabilities after Russia pummelled Ukrainian energy infrastructure with more than 200 missiles and drones on Monday.

During Tuesday's attack, Ukraine downed five out of 10 incoming missiles and 60 out of 81 drones, the air force said.

The Ukrainian air force lost track of 10 more drones that have likely come down somewhere on its territory, it said. One more crossed into Belarusian territory.

The Russian defence ministry said its forces had carried out a high-precision weapon strike on Ukraine overnight, the Interfax news agency reported. Moscow denies targeting civilians since launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, although thousands have been killed.

Several Russian military bloggers said Moscow's attacks were an "act of retaliation" for Ukraine's surprise incursion into Russia's western Kursk region - the first such action since World War Two.

In the capital Kyiv, the military administration said air defences had shot down all incoming targets aimed at the city. There were no casualties and two small fires caused by debris were put out by the emergency services, local authorities said.

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

Russia targets ‘critical airfields’ in Ukraine – MOD

Russia has carried out precision strikes against air bases in four regions of Ukraine, the Defense Ministry in Moscow reported on Tuesday. Kinzhal hypersonic missiles were among the weapons used, Moscow confirmed.

Air raid alerts sounded across Ukraine overnight Monday into Tuesday, and the media in Kiev reported explosions in Khmelnytsky, Sumy, Krivoy Rog, and Rovno Regions.

The attack targeted “critical airfield infrastructure facilities in Ukraine,” using “long-range air-launched precision weapons, including Kinzhal aeroballistic missiles, and attack UAVs,” the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement. 

“All designated targets were hit,” the military added, without elaborating.

Tuesday’s strike followed the “massive high-precision attack” on Ukrainian infrastructure supporting Kiev’s military industry, carried out overnight Sunday into Monday. Attack drones, ballistic and cruise missiles shut off electricity to much of Ukraine and targeted air bases in Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk Regions that were storing Western-supplied weapons and aircraft, Moscow said.

According to Ukrainian media, the strike was the biggest since the conflict began, involving over 230 missiles and drones hitting targets in 15 regions. 

Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky claimed on Tuesday that Kiev’s armed forces had used F-16 fighter jets to shoot down incoming missiles during the large infrastructure strike overnight on Sunday. 

“As part of this huge attack, we shot down some missiles and drones with the help of F-16s,” Zelensky told reporters, describing this as “a very good result.”

While thanking the US and its allies for sending Kiev the jets, Zelensky noted that “this is not enough, we don’t have many of them, and we still need to train pilots.”

Several NATO countries have promised up to 80 of the US-made fighters, but only about ten have been delivered so far, according to Ukrainian media. A handful of airfields in Ukraine can accommodate F-16s and Russia has been striking them repeatedly over the past month.

The Kremlin has said that the jets won’t make a difference on the battlefield and will be destroyed just like the other Western hardware provided to Ukraine since the start of the conflict.

Reuters/RT

Beyond the protests, there are a number of issues the government should pay attention to:

One, though the protesters might have different motives, they seem all united by alienation from the government and even the state system. Rather than use blackmail and strong arm tactics, the government should use credible opinion polls to articulate and aggregate the various grievances against it and the state – and then evolve sustainable strategies on how to address as many of them as it can. Boxing shadows or creating enemies where they do not exist will only exacerbate the legitimacy crisis around the government. It will be a mistake for the government to believe that it can successfully stifle speech using intimidation and blackmail. Our history shows that such a strategy has a very short shelf life – as Buhari in his first coming as a military dictator and Abacha – can testify to. In his second coming – as a civilian President- a coalition of those Buhari disdained as a dot in a circle and those Femi Adesina called ‘wailing wailers’, fought back in their own ways such that even before Buhari completed his eight year tenure, he openly complained that he was tired, and would, on leaving office, want to be as far away as possible from Abuja and politics. The truth is that citizens, in the face of oppression by those who wield state power, often adopt asymmetric strategies to fight back. This can range from misinformation, caricature and outright fake news. In this age of social media where anyone who owns a mobile phone can be a publisher, citizens are especially empowered to fight back oppression. I believe that for a government which currently has a low social capital owing to the harsh effects of its economic policies, its policy somersaults, propaganda and non-inclusive style of governance, what it needs is more friends and less enemies. It needs to find a way of winning over the hearts and minds of as many Nigerians as possible.

Two, while it is not unusual for a relatively new government to start on a wobbly note, the government, for now at least, seems confused on what it wants to achieve. For instance, while it said it wanted to implement the Orosoanya report (which recommended the merging of ministries and departments and abrogation of some) it also runs the largest cabinet of 48 Ministries and recently created another – the Ministry of Livestock Development. Similarly, while the Tinubu government initially seemed desirous of moving away from the cantankerous mode of public communication of the Buhari era, by appointing the very urbane and affable Mohamed Idris as the Minister of Information and Ajuri Ngelari as the government’s Spokesman, it also contradicted this by appointing the vile and self-confessed ethnic irredentist Bayo Onanuga as Special Adviser on information and strategy. By so doing, it negated  what would have been a new and courteous approach to public communication  to complement the commendable bridge-building efforts by the wife of the President, Remi Tinubu and a few others in the government. Similarly, some of the policies of the government raise confusion on whether Tinubu wants to be remembered as a great Nigerian President or simply wants to be more popular than the late Obafemi Awolowo in Yorubaland.

Three, Tinubu should be mindful of two key features of Nigeria’s democracy since 1999 which has always backfired but which our politicians remain funnily crazily attracted to: these are god-fatherism and clannishness. With the exception of Tinubu in Lagos, nearly all political godfathers invariably fall out with their political godsons, raising questions of why politicians remain fixated on selecting and bankrolling their successors. For clannishness and ethnocentrism which Buhari took to a previously unseen level, and which Tinubu seems eager to match, if not better in the negative, this also usually boomerangs. For instance, some of the most vicious critics of the Buhari government were Northern Muslims who were supposed to be the beneficiaries of his clannishness. Similarly, even before the protests started on August 1, many Yorubas, openly say the clannishness in Tinubu’s mode of appointments and governance “does not represent who we are”. In fact, that many of the faces of the protests are from the Yoruba ethnic extraction is enough to warn the government that Yorubanization of political life will not be enough to buy Yoruba adulation. If anything, it will likely backfire because there is a spark of the divine in all of us which makes most people to abhor injustice. Besides, clannishness attracts odium to innocent members of an ethnic in-group even when they are opposed to the leader’s nepotism.

Four, the protest has now shown that no part of this country has a monopoly of providing poor leadership to the country. In fact, that the protest was organized under the banner of #EndBadGovernance is instructive. At least for now, there seems to be a consensus that the Tinubu government is grossly underperforming. And since most Nigerians appear to believe that the fundamental problem of the country is “squarely that of leadership” (apologies to Achebe), the use of innuendo to blame the North (which has produced most of the country’s leaders), has now come under critical scrutiny. In this thinking, there is always the unproven assumption that the leadership problem of the country would be solved when the South, in particular, the “progressives” (a moniker appropriated by South-West politicians when they were in the opposition) come to power. So far it has not happened under the Tinubu presidency. Even the “reforms” embarked by the Tinubu government are mere uncritical rehash of the policies implemented by the Babangida government between 1986 and 1993 when the country adopted the IMF/World Bank supported structural Adjustment Programme, and which only succeeded in further impoverishing the country and emasculating the middle class. Alan Greenspan, who served for five terms as chairman of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve Bank (August 11 1987 to January 31 2006)   – the equivalent of our Central Bank- was famously quoted as saying that he owed his success during his tenure to the fact that he always did the opposite of the advice he received from the two Bretton Woods institutions (i.e. the IMF and the World Bank). Tinubu should seriously consider that approach. It may amount to committing class suicide for him. But that would be the surest way of putting himself on the path of being a great Nigerian President.

Jideofor Adibe is a professor of Political Science at Nasarawa State University, Keffi.

Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew while oil production dropped between the first and second quarters of 2024, according to official data.

The GDP grew by 3.19 per cent year-on-year in real terms in the second quarter of 2024, the National Bureau of Statistics has said.

The NBS said this growth rate is higher than the 2.51 per cent recorded in the second quarter of 2023 and higher than the 2.98 per cent growth in the first quarter of 2024.

The statistics bureau said this in its “Nigerian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Report Q2 2024” released on Monday.

The report said the GDP’s performance in the second quarter of 2024 was driven mainly by the Services sector, which recorded a growth of 3.79 per cent and contributed 58.76 per cent to the aggregate GDP.

It said the agriculture sector grew by 1.41 per cent, from the 1.50 per cent growth recorded in the second quarter of 2023.

It added that the growth of the Industry sector was 3.53 per cent, an improvement from -1.94 per cent recorded in the second quarter of 2023.

In terms of share of the GDP, the bureau said the Industry and Services sectors contributed more to the aggregate GDP in the second quarter of 2024 compared to the corresponding quarter of 2023.

“In the quarter under review, aggregate GDP at basic price stood at N60,930,000.58 million in nominal terms. This performance is higher when compared to the second quarter of 2023 which recorded aggregate GDP of N52,103,927.13 million, indicating a year-on-year nominal growth of 16.94 per cent,” the report said.

Oil sector

The bureau noted that the nation in the second quarter of 2024 recorded an average daily oil production of 1.41 million barrels per day (mbpd), higher than the daily average production of 1.22 mbpd recorded in the same quarter of 2023 by 0.19 mbpd and lower than the first quarter of 2024 production volume of 1.57 mbpd by 0.16 mbpd.

It said the real growth of the oil sector was 10.15 per cent (year-on-year) in Q2 2024, indicating an increase of 23.58 per cent points relative to the rate recorded in the corresponding quarter of 2023 (-13.43 per cent).

The NBS explained that the growth increased by 4.45 per cent points when compared to Q1 2024, which was 5.70 per cent.

“On a quarter-on-quarter basis, the oil sector recorded a growth rate of -10.51 per cent in Q2 2024.

“The oil sector contributed 5.70 per cent to the total real GDP in Q2 2024, up from the figure recorded in the corresponding period of 2023 and down from the preceding quarter, where it contributed 5.34 per cent and 6.38 per cent respectively,” the report said.

Non-oil sector

The non-oil sector grew by 2.80 per cent in real terms during the reference quarter (Q2 2024).

The NBS said this rate was lower by 0.78 per cent points compared to the rate recorded in the same quarter of 2023 which was 3.58 per cent and relatively same with the 2.80 per cent recorded in the first quarter of 2024.

“This sector was driven in the second quarter of 2024 mainly by financial and insurance (financial institutions); information and communication (telecommunications); agriculture (crop production); trade; and manufacturing (food, beverage, and tobacco), accounting for positive GDP growth,” it said.

In real terms, the bureau said the non-oil sector contributed 94.30 per cent to the nation’s GDP in the second quarter of 2024, lower than the share recorded in the second quarter of 2023 which was 94.66 per cent and higher than the first quarter of 2024 recorded as 93.62 per cent.

PT

The Director General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has observed that Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate on average has been steadily declining since 2014, signalling a downturn in the economic well-being of the average Nigerian.

Okonjo-Iweala, speaking at the annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) on Sunday, noted that the country’s economic fortunes experienced a reversal following the decade between 2000 and 2014, during which the average GDP growth rate was approximately 3.8%.

According to the Director-General of the WTO, this consistent GDP growth outpaced the nation’s population growth, which was only around 2.6% annually.

However, she pointed out that since 2014, the situation has reversed, with GDP showing a negative growth rate of 0.9%, as the government has been unable to sustain the positive growth achieved by previous administrations.

“Many of the big problems the NBA is grappling with today has its root in Nigeria’s failure to sustain rate of economic growth and development that consistently outpaced the growth of our population.  

“We have had episodes of reforms and faster economic growth that was not merely a function of the price of oil. But we have been unable to consolidate and build on them and millions of our compatriots have paid the price in terms of diminished job prospects and human well-being.  

“For example, in the decade between 2000 and 2014, we had an average GDP growth rate of 3.8% well above our population growth rate of 2.6% per annum, meaning that people were on average truly improving their standard of living.  

“During the following decade, average annual GDP per capita has been negative around minus 0.9% meaning people were worse off because we were not able to sustain prior positive growth momentum,” Okonjo-Iweala added. 

Nigeria must sustain good economic policies 

Speaking further, Okonjo-Iweala said the country needs to sustain good economic policies irrespective of the administration or political party in power in order to foster development in the country.

• The former Finance Minister said policy inconsistencies have accounted for the reversal in the fortune of the nation’s economic development.
• Furthermore, she advocated for a social contract between the government and the people which will go beyond the political party in power.
• According to her, this social contract must be generally accepted on what economic policies should be followed regardless of who is in power.

“Maintaining good economic and social policies; maintaining policy consistency and adding more reforms on top of that will lead us along the path of good progress that we all desire,” she added.  

What you should know 

• Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth declined to 2.98%, lower than the rate recorded in the fourth quarter of 2023 which was 3.46%, according to a report from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
• However, the GDP growth rate in the quarter is higher than the figure recorded in the corresponding quarter of 2023 which was 2.31%.

GDP measures the economic activities of a country.  

• In the past decades, Nigeria’s economic growth has been moderate as a result of low exports, a reduction in the sales of oil which accounts for about 90% of our revenue as well as other economic challenges in the country.
• Meanwhile, President Bola Tinubu has continuously said he would increase Nigeria’s GDP to a $1 trillion economy, but many analysts believe such a goal may not the feasible amid growing concerns of high inflation, low employment rate as well and rising national debt.

Nairametrics

In a bewildering turn of events that defies logic and business sense, Nigeria's national oil company, NNPC, has managed to orchestrate what can only be described as the most absurd corporate acquisition in modern history. The saga of NNPC Retail's purchase of OVH Energy Marketing Limited has morphed into a Kafkaesque nightmare where the acquired entity now controls the acquirer, raising serious questions about the competence, integrity, and motives of those at the helm of Nigeria’s national oil company.

This farcical transaction, shrouded in secrecy and mired in controversy, represents a gross betrayal of public trust and a blatant disregard for corporate governance principles. How does a profit-making state-owned enterprise end up being swallowed by the very company it purportedly acquired? The convoluted web of dealings involving NNPC Retail, OVH Energy, and Nueoil Energy reeks of backroom deals and possible corruption at the highest levels.

The recent court order dissolving NNPC Retail without winding it up and transferring its assets to OVH Energy is nothing short of scandalous. It effectively hands over a critical national asset to private hands through a legal sleight of hand. This maneuver not only undermines Nigeria's energy security but also raises alarming questions about the protection of public interests in the country’s judicial system.

The silence and apparent complicity of regulatory bodies in this matter are deafening. Where are the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Corporate Affairs Commission, and other watchdogs tasked with ensuring transparency and fairness in corporate dealings? Their inaction in the face of such a glaring anomaly is a damning indictment of Nigeria’s regulatory framework.

Most troubling is the impact on NNPC Retail's workforce, now left in limbo, unsure of their future in an organization that has been essentially hijacked. The installation of OVH's former CEO as the new head of NNPC Retail adds insult to injury, signaling a complete takeover masked as an acquisition.

This debacle demands immediate and thorough investigation by anti-corruption agencies. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) must swing into action to unravel this mystery. How did a struggling company manage to turn the tables on its buyer, effectively gaining control of a profitable state enterprise?

The House of Representatives' initial investigation, marred by controversy and eventually dissolved, points to possible high-level interference. The transfer of the probe to another committee must not be allowed to become a means of burying this scandal. Nigerians deserve answers and accountability.

This "acquisition" is not just a business transaction gone wrong; it is a national security issue. With NNPC Retail responsible for importing virtually all of Nigeria's petrol, its transfer to private hands through such dubious means puts the entire nation at risk.

The NNPC leadership's defense that they now operate as a private entity rings hollow. A company wholly owned by the Nigerian people cannot simply be handed over to private interests through corporate gymnastics without proper scrutiny and safeguards.

This editorial calls for immediate action:

1. A freeze on all aspects of this transaction pending a comprehensive, independent investigation.

2. Full disclosure of all documents and decisions related to this deal.

3. A public inquiry into the roles played by all parties involved, including government officials and judiciary members.

4. Immediate intervention by anti-corruption agencies to probe possible criminal aspects of this deal.

5. A review of the legal framework governing the privatization of state assets to prevent future abuses.

The NNPC-OVH saga is more than a corporate scandal; it is a litmus test for Nigeria's commitment to transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. The eyes of the nation and the international community are watching. It's time to unravel this riddle and hold those responsible to account. Anything less would be a betrayal of the Nigerian people and a green light for further plunder of the country’s national resources.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has increased the rates for the Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) as part of its ongoing efforts to manage liquidity in the financial system.

This decision was detailed in a circular issued on August 26, 2024, following the 296th Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, where key adjustments to interest rate policies were approved.

The CBN revised the Asymmetric Corridor around the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) from +100/-300 basis points (bps) to +500/-100 bps. This significant shift aims to discourage banks from holding excess liquidity at the central bank and to promote increased lending activities.

New Operational Rates for Banks 

The Standing Lending Facility (SLF) rate, which banks use to borrow short-term funds from the CBN, has been raised to 31.75%.

The SDF rate, applicable to deposits made by banks at the CBN, has been increased to 25.75%. The circular also specifies that:

• Commercial and Merchant Banks will receive 25.75% on deposits up to ₦3.00 billion, while deposits exceeding this amount will attract a lower rate of 19.00%.
• Payment Service Banks will receive 25.75% on deposits up to ₦1.50 billion, with amounts above this threshold earning 19.00%.

These new rates are effective immediately, with all authorized dealers expected to adhere to the updated guidelines.

What this means 

The CBN’s latest adjustments are expected to have broad implications for the banking sector. By raising both SLF and SDF rates, the central bank aims to curb excess liquidity, which is often a precursor to inflation.

• The reduction in interest rates for excess deposits is also intended to push banks toward more active lending rather than merely holding funds at the CBN.
• The changes are likely to impact the cost of funds for banks, influencing the interest rates offered to customers for both loans and deposits.
• While tighter liquidity conditions may lead to higher lending rates and potentially slower credit growth in the short term, the move could help stabilize inflation over time.
• The increase in the SLF rate means that banks looking to borrow money from the central bank to cover short-term liquidity positions will now face higher interest costs.

Sector analysts often interpret reliance on the SLF as a sign of liquidity challenges, indicating that banks tapping into this facility may be under financial strain.

Backstory: The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) at its 296th MPC meeting had retained the liquidity ratio at 30% with the MPC emphasizing its commitment to stay on course with its tightening cycle in view of the urgent need to address inflationary pressures.

The bank during its MPC meeting continued its monetary policy tightening spree by raising interest rates by 50 basis points to 26.75%.

Nairametrics