Super User

Super User

Marcel Schwantes

Ever felt like you’re invisible at work—like no one sees you, hears you, or values what you bring to the table? Psychologists actually have a term for this: anti-mattering. It’s that sinking feeling of being insignificant, and when people experience it, they tend to check out, lose motivation, or walk away entirely.

We often think top talent quits because of money or new opportunities elsewhere. For many, sure. But for high performers, there’s another, quieter reason: They don’t feel like they matter. The solution is to reverse course. In six words:

Make people feel like they matter.

Unlike pay raises or competing job offers, mattering is something self-aware leaders and managers have the power to control every single day.

In a study of 200,000 employees across 741 companies, compensation ranked dead last as a reason high performers left. What topped the list instead? Things like purpose, growth opportunities, and—most important—relationships with their leaders.

This isn’t surprising. Managers play a huge role in whether people stay or go. People want to feel like they matter. They want to experience more positive, meaningful interactions and be recognized for their unique contributions.

3 Steps to Make People Feel Like They Matter

Offering some employees their desired salary to keep them around longer is certainly an option, but it’s not sustainable under undesirable work conditions and poor managers with inadequate people skills.

Managers must realize that they have plenty of power when it comes to creating the right environment and opening up opportunities that align with employees’ personal and professional goals.

To future-proof your retention strategy and ensure people feel fulfilled by the work they are doing, here are three ways to start the process.

1. Make a way for career development

Today’s employees not only want the ability to grow their careers, but also the opportunity to explore different career paths.

Career development is no longer just about moving up the career ladder to the next position; it’s also about trying on different hats and learning new skills. Employees are interested in pursuing opportunities that align with their skills and interests and that empower them to create a career path on their own terms.

Employers need to replace traditional career ladders with lattices that enable their people to grow—not just vertically, but across departments and functions.

2. Align your company’s values to employees’

More and more, employees want to work for a company that aligns with their values. Jobs are not looked at as merely a means to pay bills but instead are increasingly viewed as part of their identity. Job seekers are looking for a more authentic connection between corporate and personal values.

A real concern is that many of the newest members of the workforce think their employers leave a lot to be desired when it comes to aligning corporate values with their personal beliefs.

If you want to hold onto top talent in the current environment, you need to make sure your people believe in the work they’re doing. 

3. Recognize your employees

Study after study—too many to mention here—has been published highlighting the importance of meaningful workplace recognition. For employees to find meaning in their work, they need frequent validation and recognition that what they do day-to-day matters in the context of the greater goals of the organization.

In one survey I tracked, employees recognized in a previous month were 29 percent more likely to agree with the statement, “The work we do at my organization has meaning and purpose for me,” compared with those who have never been recognized.

 

Inc

The World Bank has fully disbursed a $1.5 billion loan to Nigeria in record time, following the government's implementation of major economic reforms. The loan, part of the Reforms for Economic Stabilisation to Enable Transformation (RESET) Development Policy Financing initiative, was released in two tranches within six months of approval.

Key Details:

- First tranche: $750 million (IDA credit) - 12-year maturity, 6-year grace period

- Second tranche: $750 million (IBRD loan) - 24-year maturity, 11-year grace period

- Approval date: June 13, 2024

- First disbursement: July 2, 2024

- Second disbursement: November 2024

The rapid disbursement was triggered by Nigeria's implementation of three major reforms:

1. Fuel Subsidy Removal

- Complete deregulation of the fuel market

- Petrol prices now aligned with international market rates

- Over fivefold increase in fuel prices since mid-2023

2. Tax Reform

- New tax bill submitted to National Assembly in October 2024

- Proposed VAT increase to 10% by 2025

- Measures to simplify tax compliance

- Expanded input tax credits for businesses

3. Social Protection Reform

- Mandated use of National Social Registry for social programs

- Introduction of N25,000 cash transfers to vulnerable households

- Target: 15 million households (currently reached: ~4 million)

- CNG vehicle conversion program launched

Public Response and Impact:

- Protests in major cities over increased living costs

- Government defends reforms as necessary for economic stability

- Relief measures implemented but facing implementation challenges

Broader Context:

- Nigeria has secured $6.95 billion in World Bank loans over 18 months

- Additional $1.65 billion in loans under consideration for 2025

- Current World Bank debt: $16.32 billion (38% of Nigeria's external debt)

- Projects in pipeline focus on displaced persons, education, and nutrition

The World Bank has praised Nigeria's commitment to reform, noting the unprecedented speed of implementation while acknowledging the challenging impact on citizens.

Nigerian human rights lawyer and activist Dele Farotimi has credited the collective voices of Nigerians for his release after a 20-day detention in Ekiti State. Farotimi was held on charges of criminal defamation and cybercrime, stemming from allegations he made against senior lawyer Afe Babalola in his book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System.

Farotimi, who was granted bail of N30 million and released on December 24, expressed profound gratitude to Nigerians for rallying behind him. In a heartfelt social media video titled The Walk to Freedom, he broke down in tears as he recounted how the support of a united populace transcended ethnic and religious divisions.

“Nigeria Could Not Happen to Me”

“Because you wouldn’t see me as a Yoruba man or a Christian, you spoke for me,” Farotimi said, highlighting how Nigerians united for justice. “Your voices found me even beyond the walls of prison. In our collective, we could not be silenced.”

The activist described his arrest as an “abduction” rather than a lawful detention and vowed to pursue legal redress against those responsible.

The Case and Public Outcry

Farotimi’s legal troubles began with the publication of his book, where he accused Babalola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and founder of Afe Babalola University, of manipulating Nigeria’s judicial system for his clients. Babalola petitioned the police, citing 31 excerpts from the book as defamatory. This led to Farotimi’s arraignment on multiple counts of criminal defamation and cybercrime.

Despite the severity of the charges, Nigerians rallied around Farotimi, with prominent figures like Peter Obi and Omoyele Sowore advocating for his release. Sowore’s AAC and Revolution Nowmovements also mobilized in his support.

A Humbling Experience

Farotimi described his time in prison as both revealing and transformative. “Prison is a finishing school,” he remarked with a touch of humor, adding that while he appreciated the “free accommodation,” the food left much to be desired.

The experience, however, underscored the systemic flaws in Nigeria’s judicial and correctional systems. Farotimi called for justice not just for high-profile detainees but for the countless nameless individuals languishing in prison without due process.

A Nation United

The activist praised Nigerians for setting aside their differences to demand justice. “You all spoke as one, and because of that, Nigeria couldn’t happen to me,” he said.

He also acknowledged the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) for rejecting a request by Babalola’s law firm to disbar him, ruling that the allegations pertained to his role as an author, not as a practicing lawyer.

A Book’s Unexpected Rise

Farotimi’s arrest inadvertently boosted the sales of his book, which topped Amazon’s bestseller list in the elections category within 24 hours of his detention. This surge in popularity reflects a growing public interest in Nigeria’s human rights and justice issues, particularly among younger readers.

Looking Ahead

Farotimi remains committed to advocating for systemic reforms. He vowed to defend himself against all charges and to seek accountability for his detention. “I will ensure that some lawyers never practice law in this country again,” he declared.

Through his ordeal, Farotimi’s story has become a rallying cry for justice, a testament to the power of collective action, and a reminder of the strength of a united Nigeria.

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has condemned a recent military parade involving Seyi Tinubu, the son of President Bola Tinubu, calling it a troubling example of the government’s increasing personalisation of state institutions. His criticism aligns with concerns raised by Senator Ali Ndume, who lamented that Nigeria’s democracy is being undermined by a shift towards personalised governance.

In a statement released by his media adviser, Paul Ibe, Atiku described the parade as a “gross violation of military tradition” and demanded an investigation into what he termed an “unwarranted and nauseating display.” Atiku questioned the legitimacy of the “Nigeria Cadet Network,” the group involved in the parade, noting it is not a recognised entity within the Nigerian Armed Forces.

“What is even more alarming is the brazen use of firearms by civilians in this so-called parade,” Atiku stated. “This is happening at a time when illegal arms proliferation is already a dangerous problem in the country.”

Atiku’s criticism underscores the growing sentiment that the current administration is blurring the lines between personal and official roles. His call for accountability included a warning that the integrity of the Nigerian Armed Forces must be protected from political and familial interference.

Ndume Weighs In: “Democracy Has Lost Its Essence”

Adding his voice to the issue, Ndume, who represents Borno South, accused the Tinubu administration of personalising governance. In an interview with Deutsche Welle Hausa, Ndume lamented that the ideals of democracy—government of the people, by the people, and for the people—are being eroded.

“The government of the day is now ‘personalised,’” Ndume said. “Democracy is losing its essence because it no longer serves the masses. Instead, it seems to revolve around individual interests.”

Ndume’s frustrations echo his personal experiences in the Senate, where he claimed to have faced consequences for “speaking the truth.” He revealed that he was removed as Chief Whip in the 10th Senate and suspended without salary during the 8th Senate for opposing entrenched interests.

A Growing Critique of Leadership

Both Atiku and Ndume’s statements highlight a broader concern about governance under Tinubu. Atiku’s condemnation of the military parade for Seyi Tinubu and Ndume’s critique of personalised government underscore the growing perception that democratic norms are being sidelined.

Atiku urged Nigerians to hold leaders accountable, warning that unchecked personalisation of power threatens the country’s democratic foundations. Ndume, reflecting on the plight of the masses, added, “The sacrifices of the poor cannot continue to be ignored while the government operates as a private affair.”

The controversies highlight the urgent need for reforms to restore public trust in Nigeria’s democratic and institutional processes.

Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer who won the presidency in the wake of the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, endured humbling defeat after one tumultuous term and then redefined life after the White House as a global humanitarian, has died. He was 100 years old.

The longest-lived American president died on Sunday, roughly 22 months after entering hospice care, at his home in the small town of Plains, Georgia, where he and his wife, Rosalynn, who died at 96 in November 2023, spent most of their lives, The Carter Center said.

“Our founder, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, passed away this afternoon in Plains, Georgia,” the center said on the social media platform X. It added in a statement that he died peacefully, surrounded by his family.

As reaction poured in from around the world, President Joe Biden mourned Carter’s death, saying the world lost an “extraordinary leader, statesman and humanitarian” and he lost a dear friend. Biden cited Carter’s work to eradicate disease, forge peace, advance civil and human rights, promote free and fair elections and house the homeless as an example for others.

A president from Plains

A moderate Democrat, Carter entered the 1976 presidential race as a little-known Georgia governor with a broad smile, outspoken Baptist mores and technocratic plans reflecting his education as an engineer. His no-frills campaign depended on public financing, and his promise not to deceive the American people resonated after Richard Nixon’s disgrace and U.S. defeat in southeast Asia.

“If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter repeated before narrowly beating Republican incumbent Gerald Ford, who had lost popularity pardoning Nixon.

Carter governed amid Cold War pressures, turbulent oil markets and social upheaval over racism, women’s rights and America’s global role. His most acclaimed achievement in office was a Mideast peace deal that he brokered by keeping Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the bargaining table for 13 days in 1978. That Camp David experience inspired the post-presidential center where Carter would establish so much of his legacy.

Yet Carter’s electoral coalition splintered under double-digit inflation, gasoline lines and the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran. His bleakest hour came when eight Americans died in a failed hostage rescue in April 1980, helping to ensure his landslide defeat to Republican Ronald Reagan.

Carter acknowledged in his 2020 “White House Diary” that he could be “micromanaging” and “excessively autocratic,” complicating dealings with Congress and the federal bureaucracy. He also turned a cold shoulder to Washington’s news media and lobbyists, not fully appreciating their influence on his political fortunes.

“It didn’t take us long to realize that the underestimation existed, but by that time we were not able to repair the mistake,” Carter told historians in 1982, suggesting that he had “an inherent incompatibility” with Washington insiders.

Carter insisted his overall approach was sound and that he achieved his primary objectives — to “protect our nation’s security and interests peacefully” and “enhance human rights here and abroad” — even if he fell spectacularly short of a second term.

And then, the world

Ignominious defeat, though, allowed for renewal. The Carters founded The Carter Center in 1982 as a first-of-its-kind base of operations, asserting themselves as international peacemakers and champions of democracy, public health and human rights.

“I was not interested in just building a museum or storing my White House records and memorabilia,” Carter wrote in a memoir published after his 90th birthday. “I wanted a place where we could work.”

That work included easing nuclear tensions in North and South Korea, helping to avert a U.S. invasion of Haiti and negotiating cease-fires in Bosnia and Sudan. By 2022, The Carter Center had declared at least 113 elections in Latin America, Asia and Africa to be free or fraudulent. Recently, the center began monitoring U.S. elections as well.

Carter’s stubborn self-assuredness and even self-righteousness proved effective once he was unencumbered by the Washington order, sometimes to the point of frustrating his successors.

He went “where others are not treading,” he said, to places like Ethiopia, Liberia and North Korea, where he secured the release of an American who had wandered across the border in 2010.

“I can say what I like. I can meet whom I want. I can take on projects that please me and reject the ones that don’t,” Carter said.

He announced an arms-reduction-for-aid deal with North Korea without clearing the details with Bill Clinton’s White House. He openly criticized President George W. Bush for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He also criticized America’s approach to Israel with his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” And he repeatedly countered U.S. administrations by insisting North Korea should be included in international affairs, a position that most aligned Carter with Republican President Donald Trump.

Among the center’s many public health initiatives, Carter vowed to eradicate the guinea worm parasite during his lifetime, and nearly achieved it: Cases dropped from millions in the 1980s to nearly a handful. With hardhats and hammers, the Carters also built homes with Habitat for Humanity.

The Nobel committee’s 2002 Peace Prize cites his “untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.” Carter should have won it alongside Sadat and Begin in 1978, the chairman added.

Carter accepted the recognition saying there was more work to be done.

“The world is now, in many ways, a more dangerous place,” he said. “The greater ease of travel and communication has not been matched by equal understanding and mutual respect.”

‘An epic American life’

Carter’s globetrotting took him to remote villages where he met little “Jimmy Carters,” so named by admiring parents. But he spent most of his days in the same one-story Plains house — expanded and guarded by Secret Service agents — where they lived before he became governor. He regularly taught Sunday School lessons at Maranatha Baptist Church until his mobility declined and the coronavirus pandemic raged. Those sessions drew visitors from around the world to the small sanctuary where Carter will receive his final send-off after a state funeral at Washington’s National Cathedral.

The common assessment that he was a better ex-president than presidentrankled Carter and his allies. His prolific post-presidency gave him a brand above politics, particularly for Americans too young to witness him in office. But Carter also lived long enough to see biographers and historians reassess his White House years more generously.

His record includes the deregulation of key industries, reduction of U.S. dependence on foreign oil, cautious management of the national debt and notable legislation on the environment, education and mental health. He focused on human rights in foreign policy, pressuring dictators to release thousands of political prisoners. He acknowledged America’s historical imperialism, pardoned Vietnam War draft evaders and relinquished control of the Panama Canal. He normalized relations with China.

“I am not nominating Jimmy Carter for a place on Mount Rushmore,” Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s domestic policy director, wrote in a 2018 book.

“He was not a great president” but also not the “hapless and weak” caricature voters rejected in 1980, Eizenstat said. Rather, Carter was “good and productive” and “delivered results, many of which were realized only after he left office.”

Madeleine Albright, a national security staffer for Carter and Clinton’s secretary of state, wrote in Eizenstat’s forward that Carter was “consequential and successful” and expressed hope that “perceptions will continue to evolve” about his presidency.

“Our country was lucky to have him as our leader,” said Albright, who died in 2022.

Jonathan Alter, who penned a comprehensive Carter biography published in 2020, said in an interview that Carter should be remembered for “an epic American life” spanning from a humble start in a home with no electricity or indoor plumbing through decades on the world stage across two centuries.

“He will likely go down as one of the most misunderstood and underestimated figures in American history,” Alter told The Associated Press.

A small-town start

James Earl Carter Jr. was born Oct. 1, 1924, in Plains and spent his early years in nearby Archery. His family was a minority in the mostly Black community, decades before the civil rights movement played out at the dawn of Carter’s political career.

Carter, who campaigned as a moderate on race relations but governed more progressively, talked often of the influence of his Black caregivers and playmates but also noted his advantages: His land-owning father sat atop Archery’s tenant-farming system and owned a main street grocery. His mother, Lillian, would become a staple of his political campaigns.

Seeking to broaden his world beyond Plains and its population of fewer than 1,000 — then and now — Carter won an appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy, graduating in 1946. That same year he married Rosalynn Smith,another Plains native, a decision he considered more important than any he made as head of state. She shared his desire to see the world, sacrificing college to support his Navy career.

Carter climbed in rank to lieutenant, but then his father was diagnosed with cancer, so the submarine officer set aside his ambitions of admiralty and moved the family back to Plains. His decision angered Rosalynn, even as she dived into the peanut business alongside her husband.

Carter again failed to talk with his wife before his first run for office — he later called it “inconceivable” not to have consulted her on such major life decisions — but this time, she was on board.

“My wife is much more political,” Carter told the AP in 2021.

He won a state Senate seat in 1962 but wasn’t long for the General Assembly and its back-slapping, deal-cutting ways. He ran for governor in 1966 — losing to arch-segregationist Lester Maddox — and then immediately focused on the next campaign.

Carter had spoken out against church segregation as a Baptist deacon and opposed racist “Dixiecrats” as a state senator. Yet as a local school board leader in the 1950s he had not pushed to end school segregation even after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision, despite his private support for integration. And in 1970, Carter ran for governor again as the more conservative Democrat against Carl Sanders, a wealthy businessman Carter mocked as “Cufflinks Carl.” Sanders never forgave him for anonymous, race-baiting flyers, which Carter disavowed.

Ultimately, Carter won his races by attracting both Black voters and culturally conservative whites. Once in office, he was more direct.

“I say to you quite frankly that the time for racial discrimination is over,” he declared in his 1971 inaugural address, setting a new standard for Southern governors that landed him on the cover of Time magazine.

‘Jimmy Who?’

His statehouse initiatives included environmental protection, boosting rural education and overhauling antiquated executive branch structures. He proclaimed Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the slain civil rights leader’s home state. And he decided, as he received presidential candidates in 1972, that they were no more talented than he was.

In 1974, he ran Democrats’ national campaign arm. Then he declared his own candidacy for 1976. An Atlanta newspaper responded with the headline: “Jimmy Who?”

The Carters and a “Peanut Brigade” of family members and Georgia supporters camped out in Iowa and New Hampshire, establishing both states as presidential proving grounds. His first Senate endorsement: a young first-termer from Delaware named Joe Biden.

Yet it was Carter’s ability to navigate America’s complex racial and rural politics that cemented the nomination. He swept the Deep South that November, the last Democrat to do so, as many white Southerners shifted to Republicans in response to civil rights initiatives.

A self-declared “born-again Christian,” Carter drew snickers by referring to Scripture in a Playboy magazine interview, saying he “had looked on many women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.” The remarks gave Ford a new foothold and television comedians pounced — including NBC’s new “Saturday Night Live” show. But voters weary of cynicism in politics found it endearing.

Carter chose Minnesota Sen. Walter “Fritz” Mondale as his running mate on a “Grits and Fritz” ticket. In office, he elevated the vice presidency and the first lady’s office. Mondale’s governing partnership was a model for influential successors Al Gore, Dick Cheney and Biden. Rosalynn Carter was one of the most involved presidential spouses in history, welcomed into Cabinet meetings and huddles with lawmakers and top aides.

The Carters presided with uncommon informality: He used his nickname “Jimmy” even when taking the oath of office, carried his own luggage and tried to silence the Marine Band’s “Hail to the Chief.” They bought their clothes off the rack. Carter wore a cardigan for a White House address, urging Americans to conserve energy by turning down their thermostats. Amy, the youngest of four children, attended District of Columbia public school.

Washington’s social and media elite scorned their style. But the larger concern was that “he hated politics,” according to Eizenstat, leaving him nowhere to turn politically once economic turmoil and foreign policy challenges took their toll.

Accomplishments, and ‘malaise’

Carter partially deregulated the airline, railroad and trucking industries and established the departments of Education and Energy, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He designated millions of acres of Alaska as national parks or wildlife refuges. He appointed a then-record number of women and nonwhite people to federal posts. He never had a Supreme Court nomination, but he elevated civil rights attorney Ruth Bader Ginsburgto the nation’s second highest court, positioning her for a promotion in 1993. He appointed Paul Volker, the Federal Reserve chairman whose policies would help the economy boom in the 1980s — after Carter left office. He built on Nixon’s opening with China, and though he tolerated autocrats in Asia, pushed Latin America from dictatorships to democracy.

But he couldn’t immediately tame inflation or the related energy crisis.

And then came Iran.

After he admitted the exiled Shah of Iran to the U.S. for medical treatment, the American Embassy in Tehran was overrun in 1979 by followers of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Negotiations to free the hostages broke down repeatedly ahead of the failed rescue attempt.

The same year, Carter signed SALT II, the new strategic arms treaty with Leonid Brezhnev of the Soviet Union, only to pull it back, impose trade sanctions and order a U.S. boycott of the Moscow Olympics after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

Hoping to instill optimism, he delivered what the media dubbed his “malaise” speech, although he didn’t use that word. He declared the nation was suffering “a crisis of confidence.” By then, many Americans had lost confidence in the president, not themselves.

Carter campaigned sparingly for reelection because of the hostage crisis, instead sending Rosalynn as Sen. Edward M. Kennedy challenged him for the Democratic nomination. Carter famously said he’d “kick his ass,” but was hobbled by Kennedy as Reagan rallied a broad coalition with “make America great again” appeals and asking voters whether they were “better off than you were four years ago.”

Reagan further capitalized on Carter’s lecturing tone, eviscerating him in their lone fall debate with the quip: “There you go again.” Carter lost all but six states and Republicans rolled to a new Senate majority.

Carter successfully negotiated the hostages’ freedom after the election, but in one final, bitter turn of events, Tehran waited until hours after Carter left office to let them walk free.

‘A wonderful life’

At 56, Carter returned to Georgia with “no idea what I would do with the rest of my life.”

Four decades after launching The Carter Center, he still talked of unfinished business.

“I thought when we got into politics we would have resolved everything,” Carter told the AP in 2021. “But it’s turned out to be much more long-lasting and insidious than I had thought it was. I think in general, the world itself is much more divided than in previous years.”

Still, he affirmed what he said when he underwent treatment for a cancer diagnosis in his 10th decade of life.

“I’m perfectly at ease with whatever comes,” he said in 2015. “I’ve had a wonderful life. I’ve had thousands of friends, I’ve had an exciting, adventurous and gratifying existence.”

 

AP

Gaza captors tortured hostages, including minors, Israeli report says

Hostages held in Gaza were subjected to torture, including sexual and psychological abuse, starvation, burns and medical neglect, according to a new report by the Israeli Health Ministry that will be submitted to the United Nations this week.

The report is based on interviews with the medical and welfare teams which treated more than 100 Israeli and foreign hostages, most of whom were released in late November 2023, in a brief truce between Israel and Hamas. Eight hostages were rescued by the Israeli military.

The hostages include more than 30 children and teenagers, a few of whom were found to have been bound, beaten or branded with a heated object, according to the report addressed to the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture and published late on Saturday.

Women reported sexual assault by the captors, including at gunpoint. Men were beaten, starved, branded, held bound in isolation and denied access to a bathroom, the report said. Some were denied treatment for injuries and medical conditions.

The report did not identify any of the hostages by name or age, to protect their privacy, but some of the descriptions matched those provided by hostages and staff that treated them in interviews with Reuters and other media and a U.N. report.

Hamas has repeatedly denied abuse of the 251 hostages abducted from Israel during its Oct. 7, 2023 assault. About half of the 100 hostages still held in Gaza are believed by Israeli authorities to still be alive.

A fresh bid to secure a Gaza ceasefire including a hostage deal has gained momentum in recent weeks, although no breakthrough has been reported as yet.

The war began with Hamas' October 2023 attack, in which 1,200 people were killed, most of them civilians, according to Israeli authorities.

Israel's subsequent campaign against Hamas has killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to Palestinian health officials, displaced nearly all of Gaza's population and reduced much of its territory to rubble.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Israeli authorities are investigating allegations of abuse against Palestinian detainees arrested during the war.

 

Reuters

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

Russia not satisfied with Trump team’s proposals on Ukraine — Lavrov

Russia is not satisfied with the proposals of US President-elect Donald Trump's team to postpone Ukraine's membership in NATO for 20 years and to deploy a contingent of EU and UK peacekeepers there, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with TASS.

"Judging by numerous leaks and Donald Trump's own interview with Time magazine on December 12, he is talking about ‘freezing’ hostilities along the line of engagement and transferring further responsibility for confronting Russia to the Europeans. We are certainly not satisfied with the proposals made by representatives of the president-elect's team to postpone Ukraine's membership in NATO for 20 years and to deploy a peacekeeping contingent of ‘UK and European forces’ in Ukraine," the top diplomat emphasized.

At the same time, Lavrov noted that Moscow has not received any official signals from the United States on the Ukrainian settlement at the moment. "Until January 20 - the date of inauguration - Donald Trump has the status of 'president-elect,' and all policy on all fronts is determined by the incumbent president and his administration. And so far, only the latter is authorized to engage with Russia on behalf of the United States. From time to time, as we are regularly informed, this happens, but there is no talk of negotiations on Ukraine in such contacts," the Russian foreign minister explained.

 

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Russia says it thwarted Ukrainian plot to kill officer and a blogger

Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said on Saturday it had foiled a plot by Ukraine to kill a high-ranking Russian officer and a pro-Russian war blogger with a bomb hidden in a portable music speaker.

The FSB, the main successor to the Soviet-era KGB, said that a Russian citizen had established contact with an officer from Ukraine's GUR military intelligence agency through the Telegram messaging application.

On the instructions of the Ukrainian intelligence officer, the Russian citizen had then retrieved a bomb from a hiding place in Moscow, the FSB said. The bomb, equivalent to 1 1/2 kg of TNT and packed with ball bearings, was concealed in a portable music speaker, the FSB said.

The FSB did not name the officer or the blogger who was the target of the plot. Ukraine's GUR military intelligence agency could not be immediately reached for comment.

Ukraine says Russia's war against it poses an existential threat to the Ukrainian state and has made clear it regards targeted killings - intended to weaken morale and punish those Kyiv regards guilty of war crimes - as legitimate.

Russia has said they amount to illegal "acts of terrorism" and accuses Ukraine of assassinating civilians such as Darya Dugina, the daughter of a nationalist ideologue, in 2022.

On Dec. 17, Ukraine's SBU intelligence service killed Lieutenant General Kirillov, chief of Russia's Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Protection Troops, in Moscow outside his apartment building by detonating a bomb attached to an electric scooter. Kyiv had accused him of promoting the use of banned checmial weapons, something Moscow denies.

Donald Trump's designated Ukraine envoy, retired Lieutenant-General Keith Kellogg, told Fox News on Dec. 18 that such killings were "not really smart" and going "a little bit too far."

Russia said that it would take revenge for the Kirillov killing.

By the time Muhammadu Buhari ran for a second presidential term in 2019, it seemed clear that the judicial process in many parts of the country had been actively co-opted in the intimidation of civic opponents of the government, both real and imagined. The case of Steven Kefas was a defining moment in that process.

Steven was a compelling activist and amplifier of the crisis of human security in Southern Kaduna under former governor, Nasir el-Rufai. For this, el-Rufai arranged his abduction from his residence in Rivers State on 8 May 2019. From there they bundled Steven into interminable detention in Kaduna, on the imagined crime of criminally defaming Cafra Caino, an acolyte of the governor who was also chair of the Kajuru Local Government Council.

For this invented crime, el-Rufai had Steven charged before a Magistrate in Kaduna, who refused him bail even when the crime was clearly a misdemeanour. Steven renewed his application for bail before the Federal High Court in Kaduna where the presiding judge, Peter Mallong, incredulously ruled that his suit was “an abuse of court process” because the Magistrate had previously refused bail. Turning judicial precedent on its head, Mallong held that the decision of the Magistrate was binding on the Federal High Court.

Gloria Ballason, who argued Steven’s case, was also my lawyer when el-Rufai sought to abduct me too in circumstances that would have been not dissimilar to what he did to Steven. On the eve of the presidential election in 2019, el-Rufai went public with claims of the massacre of scores of Fulanis in Kajuru, a community against which he appeared to have an implacable beef. The following morning, I publicly rebutted his claims. The security services were pointedly unable to support his claims.

After the 2019 elections, el-Rufai instructed my prosecution before the Magistrates Court in Kaduna on the fanciful charges of incitement and injurious falsehood. The case did not even have a charge number. The magistrate called up the case on two successive occasions and, when I did not show up, decided the time was ripe to issue a warrant for my abduction. Contrary to my entitlements under the Nigerian constitution, they did not even bother to bring the charges to my attention. It seemed as if the entire objective from the beginning was to set me up for abduction.

Informed off-record about the case by sympathetic law enforcement agents subsequently, Ballason first issued filings objecting to how the court had chosen to proceed. Thereafter, she instituted proceedings before Mallong’s Federal High Court in Kaduna against el-Rufai and the police, arising out of these facts, alleging the breach of my constitutional rights.

One year after the case was instituted, in October 2020, Mallong issued his decision. He claimed that the affidavit in support of my court processes, sworn to by a litigation clerk in the law firm of my lawyers, was incompetent because the deponent was someone other than me. It was as if he had never heard of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules, which allowed for what the litigation clerk did. As a result, Mallong said my case was incompetent and his court lacked jurisdiction over it. After holding that he lacked jurisdiction, however, Mallong went on to “dismiss” my case.

The judgment was manifestly crooked on the face of the record. A judge can only dismiss a case that s/he has had the opportunity to consider but a judge cannot consider a case over which s/he lacks jurisdiction. So, a judge who rules that he or she lacks jurisdiction cannot thereafter decide to dismiss the same case. That is exactly what Mallong did. Having accomplished such crookedness, he then went on to award punitive costs against me.

It was this kind of casuistic and crooked jurisprudence that emboldened el-Rufai and his ilk to routinise the persecution of Nigerian citizens by abduction under the cover of law. I was lucky. Kefas was not. Ballason’s tenacity and an international campaign eventually enabled to Steven to make bail after 162 days in pre-trial detention in Kaduna prison.

According to Steven, while he suffered prolonged pre-trial detention for an imaginary crime framed against him for being a critic of government, he witnessed kidnappers caught in the act being released without charges. Steven’s explanation is that: “What the oppressive elites do in Nigeria is that they will hire rogue lawyers to help them draft all manner of petitions to get critics and ‘enemies of the government’ abducted and locked up….”

This appears to be the perfect description for what is happening in an ongoing case involving the prosecution of Precious Eze, Olawale Olurotimi, Rowland Olonishuwa and Seun Odunlami before the Federal High Court in Lagos. The accused are all bloggers who run different platforms as citizen journalists or aggregators.

On 19 September, Country Hill, a law firm acting on behalf of Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO) and its CEO, Segun Agbaje, wrote a petition in which they complained against the accused for what they called “acts of cyberbullying, criminal extortions (sic) and conducts (sic) likely to cause a breach of public peace” arising reportedly from material published on their blogs about Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank). Importantly, the complaint omitted any mention of the sums that any of the suspects allegedly extorted or sought to. Subsequent investigation by the police showed clearly that upon the material being brought to their attention by intermediaries, the suspects had voluntarily pulled down the publications complained of.

Acting on this petition, nevertheless, the police promptly arrested and detained Eze and Olurotimi, both of who have been held in pre-trial custody since then. By the date you read this, each of them would have been in pre-trial custody for over 91 days. That is more than double the maximum duration of 42 days of pre-trial custody allowed by the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

It took the police just four days to conclude investigation. Michael Abu, the chief superintendent of Police (CSP) who led the investigation into GTBank’s petition, wrote in his report of 23 September, with reference to Precious Eze and Olawale Olurotimi, that “these types of people be used as scapegoat” and recommended that they be “charged  to court for the offence (sic) of conspiracy, cyberbullying, attempt to extort money through fraudulent means and conduct likely to cause the breach of peace.”

On 14 October, the police re-arraigned them. Ten days later, the amended charges filed against them included six counts of cyberbullying and two each of conspiracy and extortion. To prosecute them, GTBank secured the “fiat” of the Inspector General of Police to instruct a high-powered team of ten lawyers, including three Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs). This is a classic example of “oppressive elites” capturing the criminal process for destructive purposes against poor citizens.

Until now, the people who orchestrate these kinds of travesties and their judicial and legal co-travelers have enjoyed earthly impunity. Judges like Mallong made this possible. The one lesson, however, of the Dele Farotimi case is that citizens now have the wherewithal to make these kinds of perversion of the legal and criminal process costly for those who orchestrate them.

In this case of Eze and Olurotimi, that should be even moreso, given that the travesty is procured at the instance of a commercial and corporate actor. We are both citizens and customers. In this dual capacity we have the muscle to resist the determined conspiracy of politicians and corporates who seek to muzzle and destroy an informed and responsible civics. It is not too late for GTBank to retrace its steps.

** Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, a professor of law, teaches at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and can be reached through This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

It seems the high cost of vegetable oil has done what no culinary innovation could—turn Nigerians into air fryer enthusiasts overnight. Once considered a kitchen gadget for the “oyinbo lifestyle,” air fryers are now as common in Nigerian homes as jollof rice at a wedding.

Back in 2018, a 5-litre bottle of vegetable oil cost N2,100—practically pocket change. But fast forward to 2024, and that same bottle now goes for N22,000. For perspective, that’s the price of a decent second-hand smartphone. A 25-litre keg, which used to cost N9,500, is now between N95,000 and N105,000—enough to make anyone question their love for fried plantains.

Enter the air fryer, a modern-day hero for the broke and health-conscious alike. Nigerians, always ready to adapt, have embraced it as a budget-friendly alternative to oil-heavy frying.

Take Mrs. Chinenye Anyadike, a businesswoman who recently bought a second-hand 3.5-litre air fryer for N18,000. “Gone are the days of chasing vegetable oil prices,” she said. “Why buy 10 litres of oil for N49,000 only to use it up in three months? I’m done playing this frying game.”

Similarly, Mrs. Fatimah Arogundade, a banker, was initially skeptical. “I thought spending N45,000 on an air fryer was a waste until my friend convinced me. Now, I even get oil from the beef I air fry. Imagine that—free oil! It’s the best festive season decision I’ve ever made,” she quipped.

Even men are jumping on the air fryer train. Mr. Kolade Adepegba, a commercial driver, was persuaded to buy a fairly used one for his wife after a woman delivering two air fryers casually remarked, “Oga, do you even know how expensive vegetable oil is now?” His wife’s reaction? Pure joy—and perhaps a bit of relief that she could finally stop saving up for one.

But as with all trends, demand is driving up prices. A 3.5-litre air fryer now costs between N45,000 and N55,000, while larger models range from N65,000 to N350,000. Fairly used ones are slightly cheaper, going for N15,000 to N40,000.

Still, Nigerians are undeterred. “In this country, you have to be wise to survive,” said Anyadike. And if that wisdom comes with crispy, oil-free fried plantains, so be it.

At least 62 people were killed when an airliner veered off the runway and erupted into a fireball as it slammed into a wall at South Korea's Muan International Airport on Sunday, the national fire agency said.

Two people were rescued, the agency said.

The crash occurred as Jeju Air flight 7C2216, carrying 175 passengers and six crew on a flight from the Thai capital Bangkok, was landing shortly after 9 a.m. (0000 GMT) at the airport in the south of the country, South Korea's transport ministry said.

The ministry did not confirm the reports of casualties.

At least 58 bodies have been recovered but that number is not final, another fire official told Reuters.

Two people were found alive and rescue operations were under way, a Muan fire official said. Yonhap news agency said three people had been rescued.

Authorities were working to rescue people in the tail section, an airport official told Reuters shortly after the crash.

Video shared by local media showed the twin-engine aircraft skidding down the runway with no apparent landing gear before slamming into a wall in an explosion of flame and debris. Other photos showed smoke and fire engulfing parts of the plane.

Yonhap cited airport authorities as saying the landing gear may have malfunctioned due to a bird strike.

A passenger texted a relative to say a bird was stuck in the wing, agency News1 reported. The person's final message was, "Should I say my last words?"

Bird strike is among several theories that have not been verified, an official from the transport ministry's aviation department said, adding that the investigation was ongoing.

The passengers included two Thai nationals and the rest are believed to be South Koreans, according to the transportation ministry.

The plane was a Boeing 737-800 jet operated by Jeju Air, which was seeking details of the accident, including its casualties and cause, an airline spokesperson said.

Boeing and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

All domestic and international flights at Muan airport had been cancelled, Yonhap reported.

South Korean acting President Choi Sang-mok, who was named interim leader of the country on Friday after the previous acting president was impeached amid an ongoing political crisis, ordered all-out rescue efforts, his office said.

His chief of staff convened an emergency meeting.

 

Reuters

May 13, 2025

NGX records significant growth in Q1 2025 trading activity

The Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) reported a remarkable 44.8% surge in equity transactions for Q1…
May 12, 2025

Northern leaders demand urgent action on insecurity, push for state police

Amid worsening insecurity across Nigeria, the 19 Northern governors and traditional rulers have called for…
May 14, 2025

The dark side of ambition - Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

Ambition is one of the most defining forces in human affairs—a psychological engine that propels…
May 10, 2025

Town residents involutarily get high after Police burn 20 tons of confiscated cannabis

The 25,000 residents of Lice, a town in Turkey’s Diyarbakır province, involuntarily got high after…
May 14, 2025

Boko Haram, ISWAP terrorists attack four military bases in Borno within 24 hours, soldiers killed

Tension is rising in Borno State after Boko Haram and ISWAP insurgents attacked four military…
May 14, 2025

Here’s the latest as Israel-Hamas war enters Day 586

Israeli military intercepts missile launched from Yemen The Israeli military said it intercepted a missile…
May 11, 2025

African diet – plantains and cassava can be as healthy as tomatoes and olive oil,…

Plantains, cassava and fermented banana drink should be added to global healthy eating guidelines alongside…
May 13, 2025

Nigeria's Flying Eagles qualify for World Cup after dramatic win over Senegal

Nigeria's U-20 national football team, the Flying Eagles, have secured their place at the 2025…

NEWSSCROLL TEAM: 'Sina Kawonise: Publisher/Editor-in-Chief; Afolabi Ajibola: IT Manager;
Contact Us: [email protected] Tel/WhatsApp: +234 811 395 4049

Copyright © 2015 - 2025 NewsScroll. All rights reserved.