Print this page
Wednesday, 09 April 2025 04:57

Ndume accuses Tinubu of unconstitutional appointments; Presidency fires back, calls him ‘divisive’

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Ali Ndume, senator representing Borno South, has criticized President Bola Tinubu for allegedly violating constitutional provisions on federal character in his political appointments, sparking a sharp rebuke from the Presidency, which labeled him a "rabble rouser" promoting divisive narratives.

Speaking on Arise TV, Ndume argued that Tinubu’s appointments disproportionately favour the South-West, contravening Section 14(3) of the 1999 Constitution, which mandates equitable representation.

"The figures are there. It’s not that I’m just making accusations, but the constitution clearly states that political appointments should reflect federal character, and that is not the case here," Ndume said. He clarified that his remarks were not a personal attack but a constitutional duty as a lawmaker.

"I have the right to criticize the government—that’s why I’m in the National Assembly. We are supposed to oversight the president and point out irregularities," he stated, adding that he expected backlash from Tinubu’s supporters but would not be silenced.

However, the Presidency swiftly dismissed Ndume’s claims as hypocritical. Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, accused the senator of "selective perception" and ignoring key appointments from his own region.

"President Tinubu’s appointments are based on merit, integrity, and geographical spread, not tribal arithmetic," Onanuga stated on X. He noted that two prominent NNPC appointees hail from Ndume’s senatorial district, questioning his narrative of exclusion.

Onanuga further criticized Ndume for "headline-chasing" rather than offering constructive criticism, reaffirming Tinubu’s commitment to inclusive governance. "The president aims to harness Nigeria’s diversity to build a prosperous nation," he added.

The exchange highlights growing tensions over Tinubu’s appointments, with critics accusing him of regional bias while the administration defends its choices as merit-based and balanced.