Representatives of civil society groups, government and private institutions, and the media on Monday, asked Senate to drop further consideration of the anti-social media bill, in the interest of Nigerians.
Our correspondents observed that only three speakers out of the 62 individuals, institutions and groups, who submitted memoranda and spoke at the public hearing organised by Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, supported the proposed legislation.
Those who opposed the bill argued that it violated the fundamental human rights of Nigerians and contravenes existing international statutes to which Nigeria was a signatory.
They also insisted that there were sufficient legislation which had already taken care of protection from falsehood and manipulations.
Antagonists of the proposed legislation, sponsored by Mr Sani Musa, said the ambiguity of the bill would result to lack of citizen’s trust and confidence in governance.
They also noted with great concern that similar law in Singapore where the bill was plagiarised, was being used by the government there to target critics and political enemies.
They were unanimous in their submissions that the emergence of social media had contributed greatly in expanding frontiers for good governance.
They said citizens reporting on government abuses had embolden citizens to hold government and their agencies accountable.
Those against the anti-social media legislation further argued that the bill would stifle rights of freedom of expression as citizens would be too scared to speak up and hold the government accountable for their actions.
Shortly after the public hearing was declared open by President of the Senate, Mr Ahmad Lawan, Nigerians, who spoke at the hearing, kicked against the bill, on the grounds that it did not represent the interest of Nigerians.
Those who spoke against the bill included: head of Civil Society Organisation Situation Room, Mr Clement Nwankwo, National President of the Nigeria Union of Journalists, Mr Christopher Isiguzo and Executive Vice-Chairman of Nigerian Communication Commission, Mr Umar Dambata.
They also included Chairman of the Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria, Mr Saad Ibrahim and Chairman of DAAR Communication, Mr Raymond Dokpesi Jr.
Publisher of Sahara Reporters, Mr Omoyele Sowore, Amnesty International and Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre and Socio-Economics Rights and Accountability Project, among others, also called for its rejection.
Executive Director, YIAGA Africa, Mr Samson Itodo, said, “The 9th Senate is therefore urged to take historical note of how previous sessions of the National Assembly had sided with the people and resisted executive overbearing and repression.
“YIAGA Africa is of the firm view that the Protection from Internet Falsehood and Manipulation Bill (Social Media Bill) is not reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.
“Even though the government’s purpose may be legitimate and substantial, that purpose cannot be pursued by means that broadly stifle fundamental personal liberties.
“We strongly believe that the bill contravenes extant laws that guarantee citizens freedom of expression and thought.”
But Nigerian Army supported the bill arguing that even in advanced democracies, they still have a way of regulating the media.
Representing Chief of Army Staff, Mr Yusuf Buratai, Mr Solomon Udoma, a major general, said “false information undermine leadership, destroy peace and threatens unity.”
However, one of the supporters of the bill, who is Director of Administration of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Society, Mr Ustaz Yusuf Nwoha, said aspects of the bill which could infringe on the rights of Nigerians should be expunged.
Independent Corrupt Practices Commission represented by Mr Esa Onoja, maintained a neutral position.
Chairman of Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Mr Opeyemi Bamidele, said over 60 individuals, groups and institutions volunteered to speak on the bill.
He, however, said the views and opinions expressed by stakeholders at the forum would form the basis for his committee’s report.
The sponsor of the bill said the legislation sought to regulate information being posted on the social media to guide against abuse.
President of Senate, Lawan, said, “I agree that matters of freedom of speech and the inalienable rights of man are issues we should not compromise. I also agree that the right of an individual ends where the rights of another individual begins.
“As a people however, we cannot stop discussing this freedom and its limitations for peace and harmony, growth and development.”
Meanwhile, in a memo by its Executive Director, Mr Lanre Arogundade, International Press Centre restated its opposition to the bill, describing it as a duplication of existing laws, including the Cybercrime (Prohibition) Act.
IPC said, “In view of the mandate of our organisation to promote and protect media freedom and independence, the Internet rights of journalists, and online bloggers, the right to freedom of expression and access to information and the right of Nigerian citizens to political participation without unnecessary hindrance, we hereby formally restate our opposition to the bill and demand that it should be withdrawn.
“More importantly, the provisions of the bill violate various national, regional and international declarations and conventions including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the African Charter of Peoples Rights, that have over the years expanded the frontiers of civic and political rights.”
Punch
