Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Monday described the 48 Compact Discs evidence tendered by People Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Mr Atiku Abubakar, as lacking in probative value.
Counsel to Abubakar, Mr Chris Uche, had led a Spokesperson for Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation, Mr Segun Sowunmi, to tender the materials before the five-man panel of justices.
During his cross-examination by Mr Yunus Usman, Counsel for INEC, Sowunmi agreed that the Resident Electoral Commissioner for Akwa Ibom was not a spokesperson for the commission.
Mr Usman also made the witness to confirm that the chairman of the electoral body only expressed the hope of the commission to transmit results of the general election electronically, but that it was actually done.
He was of the view that the video clips front-loaded by the witness had nothing to do with the February 23 general elections.
Sowunmi attested to Usman’s question by saying that the four clips were events that preceded the elections.
The other clip was on the president’s certificate controversy as the army confirmed that Mr Buhari had West African Examination Certificate with credits in English Language, History, Geography and a pass in English Literature.
Meanwhile, Mr Alex Izinyon, Counsel for Mr Buhari, had tendered a video clip dated February 6 where chairman of the commission hinged the possible transmission of the election electronically to the signing of a new Electoral Act.
Drama however ensued as the petitioners’ legal team refused to allow their system to be used to play the CD.
In the circumstance, Izinyon filed an oral application for adjournment to allow his team bring their system and screen to continue with the cross examination of the witness.
Mr Mohammed Garba went ahead to adjourn the proceedings until July 16 for continuation.
Earlier, Abubakar presented three of their witnesses totaling about 40 out of the 400 that were listed to testify so far.
On their parts, Babagana Kukawa, Abana Pogu, Suleman Mohammed, Local Government Area Collation Agents for PDP had alleged over voting, vote buying, and violence disruption of the election in their various states.
When they were crossed examined, the witnesses were unable to back up their allegations with documentary evidence.
Counsel to INEC had reminded them that their signature on Forms EC8C (Results transmitted to the local government areas) were approval of the exercise at polling units and wards level across their states.